RTI says Maharashtra charity commissioner did not propose Tata Trusts rule
In short
An RTI response says the Maharashtra Charity Commissioner did not send any proposal for the amendment linked to the Tata Trusts board freeze. The report says the amendment has paralysed Sir Ratan Tata Trust and helped create a deadlock at Tata Sons.
This matters because the board dispute is still not resolved. The reporting does not say who proposed the change or when the deadlock will end.
What the reporting says
An RTI response says the Maharashtra Charity Commissioner did not send any proposal for an amendment that froze the Tata Trusts board and helped create a deadlock at Tata Sons. The reporting cites a regulator denial rather than a formal policy change, but it does not state who moved the amendment or whether it has been reversed. The immediate effect is continued uncertainty around the board paralysis.
Why it matters
An RTI response says the Maharashtra Charity Commissioner did not propose the amendment that froze the Tata Trusts board and contributed to a deadlock at Tata Sons. The reporting identifies a regulator denial, not a policy resolution. It leaves unclear who initiated the amendment, why it was adopted, and whether any next step will restore normal board functioning.