Saurav Das alleges police could plant evidence in brief
In short
Saurav Das of CJP said police could plant evidence and referred to 'phone cloning' in a press brief. No official document or primary source was provided, and the report does not say when or where this happened.
It matters because the claim raises concerns about evidence handling, but the reporting does not establish the case behind it or what, if anything, changes next.
What the reporting says
Saurav Das of CJP alleged that police could plant evidence and cited 'phone cloning' in a press brief, but the available reporting provides no primary or official document. The source does not state when the remarks were made, where they were delivered, or what specific case prompted them. The immediate consequence and the underlying facts remain unclear.
Why it matters
Saurav Das of CJP alleged in a press brief that police could plant evidence and mentioned 'phone cloning.' The available material does not include an official document or primary source, so the date, location, and case context are not established. The report leaves the central factual basis, any response from police, and any immediate legal impact unknown.