Mehli Mistry says SRTT delayed reply for four months
In short
Mehli Mistry says SRTT did not reply for four months and that the delay was intentional. The trust says a charity commissioner’s order is part of the matter.
This matters because it suggests a dispute over procedure and timing. The report does not say what the proceedings are about or what decision could come next.
What the reporting says
Mehli Mistry alleges that SRTT did not reply for four months and says the delay was deliberate, according to the publisher summary. The trust pointed to a charity commissioner’s order, but the available reporting does not say what the underlying proceedings were or what reply was sought. The immediate legal or governance outcome is not stated.
Why it matters
Mehli Mistry alleges that SRTT failed to reply for four months and that the delay was deliberate, according to the publisher summary. The trust cites a charity commissioner’s order, but the report does not explain the underlying case, the requested response, or any ruling. The possible effect on the parties’ legal position remains unclear.