SRTT tells charity commissioner order limited its response on Mehli reply
In short
SRTT told Maharashtra’s charity commissioner that an order left it unable to respond fully to the Mehli Mistry reply.
The filings also questioned Venu Srinivasan’s vote after his trustee term ended and Noel Tata’s eligibility to serve on a charitable trust.
What the reporting says
SRTT told Maharashtra’s charity commissioner that its order had tied its hands on the Mehli Mistry reply, while the filing also raised questions over trustee eligibility. Mint Companies said former Tata Trusts trustee Mehli Mistry questioned Venu Srinivasan’s vote after his trustee tenure expired and challenged Noel Tata’s eligibility to serve on a charitable trust. The matter centers on filings before the charity commissioner.
Why it matters
SRTT told Maharashtra’s charity commissioner that an order had limited its response to the Mehli Mistry matter. The related filing also said former Tata Trusts trustee Mehli Mistry questioned Venu Srinivasan’s vote after his trustee tenure expired and challenged Noel Tata’s eligibility to serve on a charitable trust. The story is about a charity-commissioner filing and trustee eligibility questions, not a final ruling.